The Latest Unwitting Chump in the Obama Occidental Hoax: DelMarVa Observer
February 5, 2012 at 8:38 pm
It looks journalistic with all that fancy fonting, but the DelMarVa Observer apparently doesn’t take the trouble to check newsbanks or even Google before submitting “news stories” from the “AP” that are actually hoax e-mails.
February 5, 2012:

Congratulations, DelMarVa Observer, you’re the latest venue to fall into the role of hoaxer’s chump.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Entry filed under: chumps. Tags: barack obama, chump, hoax, hoaxer, obama, occidental, soetoro, transcript.
1.
G. A . Harrison | February 5, 2012 at 10:15 pm
The item may or not be a hoax. If you had bothered to read the entire post you would have noted that it wouldn’t matter. First, it states that it was from a reader. I know the reader and am willing to give them more benefit of doubt that you who cite ZERO evidence as to your claim. But, again, it doesn’t matter.
Why?
As I noted in the post (which, again, you obviously didn’t read) the veracity of the claims did not add up to Obama not being constitutionally qualified to run for the office he now holds. There seems to be little doubt that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Because of the 14th Amendment he’s a natural born citizen. Doesn’t matter whether one parent, or even both, were not US citizens at the time of his birth. There is also little doubt that his mother was a US citizen. The laws of the US make him a natural born citizen. If the claim that he applied for financial aid as a “foreign” student was true, that would make him guilty of fraud (which couldn’t be prosecuted now). Again, so what? Ironically, a judge in Georgia seems to agree with my core assertion.
I may not like the President. I’ll certainly never vote for him. That does not make him constitutionally unqualified to hold office since the only requirements are to be over 35 and a natural born US citizen.
What is your goal? If it was to merely play “GOTCHA”, then you failed miserably. The logic of my argument was not based on the “evidence” which you claim is a hoax.
2.
Amfoi Joe | February 5, 2012 at 10:47 pm
Oh, I read it alright.
No, my goal is to prevent credulous fools like you from sharing “news” again without the simplest check of the facts … which will show you that indeed, the “news” you shared was a hoax.
Exercise due diligence and you won’t be embarrassed again.
3.
Ole in WI | April 6, 2012 at 11:22 pm
OK, you call your self “Americans for Freedom of Information”, then why has Obama spent over a million dollars on his lawyers to keep from releasing the following documents, if there is nothing to hide?
Among the other documents not released by Obama are his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
Seriously!? Why would someone block these records if they had NOTHING to hide?
4.
Amfoi Joe | June 7, 2012 at 2:48 pm
Show me documentation specifying the dollar amount that Barack Obama has spent on lawyers to keep his documents from being released. Show me that documentation. If you can’t, then you’re making your claims up, “Ole in WI.”